>"What right does State or anyone have to command human labor?"

I am not talking morality, I'm talking physical reality. The problem is you are an idealist, you think the world is driven by people's morals, and not the physical conditions on the ground.

The state (private and public enterprises) has the "right" to command labor because they hold a monopoly on violence and thus "might makes right," but that monopoly is also sustained by the fact that they command labor, and thus the state can continually acquire tools of oppression to maintain that power.

They do not need some moral "right" to maintain power. They maintain power because physically, only the ground, these social institutions that make up the state (private and public) just factually have power, whether we like it or not. We can morally condemn it all we wish, but it doesn't change physical reality. Reality does not care your opinion of it.

If you actually want to challenge the state's authority, you have to challenge the material, real-world physical foundations of the state, which is its production and reproduction of goods and services which all play a role in facilitating the reproduction of the state's monopoly on power.

Challenging the state's authority cannot be done by defeating them in the "free marketplace of ideas" with moralistic arguments about they don't have the "right" to their authority. Challenging the state's authority also cannot be done by attacking the symbols of its authority, like money, which is literally just a piece of paper, and sometimes not even a piece of paper but just numbers in a computer.

You have to actually challenge their control over the production and reproduction of material goods and services, that continually reproduce/replenish the state's foundations.